​On October 16, 2026, Chinese Social Sciences Today published an article by Professor Chen Zhimin, Executive Director of the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance and Vice President of Fudan University. The article systematically explains China’s AI governance philosophy from four aspects: putting people first, inclusiveness and shared benefits, AI for Good, and openness and cooperation. Drawing on exchanges with Global South countries, Professor Chen also noted that the focus of Global Sou

On 14 October 2026, Study Times, organized by the Central Party School, published an article authored by Yao Xu, Secretary-General of the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance and Associate Professor at the Fudan Development Institute.

On October 8, 2026, Chinese Social Sciences Today published an article by Li Yan, Distinguished Research Fellow at the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance (CGAIG) and Director of the Institute of Science, Technology and Cybersecurity at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR). The article argues that a new wave of technological revolution is reshaping the underlying logic and operational rules of global technology governance, posing challenges that no single

On October 4, 2026, People's Daily Online invited Li Yan, Distinguished Research Fellow at the Global Center for AI Innovation and Governance (CGAIG) and Director of the Institute of Science, Technology and Cybersecurity at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), to discuss cooperation between China and the United States in the field of artificial intelligence, and published an article titled China–US Consensus on Artificial Intelligence Benefits Both Countries and

On September 30, 2026, Study Times published an article by Yang Qingfeng, Research Fellow at the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance and Professor at the Institute of Technology Ethics for Human Future, Fudan University. The article argued that the autonomous learning and evolution of AI give rise to ethical risks such as algorithmic sycophancy, agent collusion, value misguidance, and blurred rights and responsibilities, which traditional after-the-fact governance finds difficult to addre

On September 21, 2026, Democracy and Legal SystemWeekly published a foreword article authored by Cai Cuihong, Deputy Director of the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance and Professor at the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University. The article argues that AI governance should seek to maintain a dynamic balance between development and security by precisely defining the scope and targets of regulation, employing governance tools in a coordinated manner, and dynamically adjusting

On September 17, 2026, The Straits Times, Singapore’s oldest and most widely circulated English-language newspaper, published a feature titled “As the US ups the stakes on AI, can China win over the world with open-weight models?” The report featured an interview with YAO Xu, Secretary-General of the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance (CGAIG) and Associate Professor at the Fudan Development Institute.

On September 15, 2026, Social Sciences Weekly published an article written by Yang Qingfeng, Research Fellow at the Center for Global AI Innovative Governance (CGAIG) and Professor of the Institute of Science and Technology Ethics for Human Future, Fudan University. The article argues that large language models (LLMs), much like universal keys, are gradually unlocking new possibilities across nearly every aspect of our lives and work. They are demonstrating increasingly sophisticated autonomy an