Abstract：Amid the rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence and the growing politicization of emerging technologies, global AI governance is increasingly shaped by strategic competition among major powers. This paper analyzes the emerging triadic contest among the United States, China, and the European Union over AI governance and argues that it is reshaping global order through a fusion of technological rivalry, institutional competition, and normative contestation. It compares three governance paradigms — U.S. “innovation-first”, China’s sovereignty-centered, state-guided model, and the EU’s rules-based, rights-oriented approach — and traces how they collide across four battlegrounds: technological supremacy, global rulemaking and standards, Global South markets and infrastructure, and military AI. The paper shows that this rivalry is accelerating digital fragmentation (“splinternet”), raising duplication and compliance costs, weakening a shared innovation commons, and heightening systemic and security risks. It concludes by proposing “managed contest”: bounded competition coupled with minimal cooperative guardrails and interoperable frameworks to contain shared AI risks.
Keywords: AI governance; geopolitical competition; triadic order; normative power; technological rivalry.
Author: Cuihong Cai
Source: Cai, C. H. (2026). Triadic Contest: The US, China, EU, and the Battle for the Soul of AI. Chinese Journal of International Review, 8(1).
Publish Date: 2026/4/2
triadic-contest-the-us-china-eu-and-the-battle-for-the-soul-of-ai.pdf
